Offshore Outsourcing & Scammer
Blog about offshore outsourcing and scammer in the outsourcing industry
LinkedIn Scammer: munna shaikh - confirms that he has no contract with any client
by Rudolf Faix Saturday, September 19, 2015 4:33 AM

LinkedIn profile graphic Munna ShaikIt seems that the scammer Munna Shaikh needs urgently money and for this reason he has invented a form filling campaign.  Like each scammer he cannot show his face and uses instead a stolen graphic as profile picture. He does not like to provide a manhunt picture by himself.  He provides only one contact possibility - an Indian phone number – besides the email address he uses at the moment.  With other words everything is prepared for a fast disappearing.

With the statement “SO AT LEAST, WE MUST EARN SOME THING ON PROJECTS” in his email he declares by himself, that he does not have any contract with the client and that he is a scammer. With this statement he is declaring that at least he – the scammer - has to earn an invention fee paid by the center. A client which hires a broker has to pay the broker!

The LinkedIn mail from the Scammer Munna Shaikh:

*Dear Centers,*
Please find the below Reliance online form filling process details.

** *Reliance Form Filling Process*****

*Description:***A To fill the details of new connection into the

company's online portal with provided login ids & pwds.
Each form will contain 20 entries .

*Time Consumption: *30 to 40 seconds per form

Consultancy charges: - Rs 1,00,000/- +12.36 % Service tax paid { Not Adjust Billing }
Royalty :- 10 %

Work load : Unlimited

Nature of work : form filling

*Payout : 6 Rs per form *

Training Provided Online

Sign Up :- Online / Onsite

Billing cycle: Monthly (after raising invoice 15 days)

Monthly Billing:3 Lac - 4 Lacs/ Slot center can

get approximately depending on agents performance.

Available slots: 02

NOTE :- Only Interested Center Apply


*Thanks & Regards.*
Seema Khan
*join me on whatsup .*9158646476





The scammer Munna Shaikh offered the same campaign already at LinkedIn Pulse on August 18, 2015 with a screenshot. The screenshot shows a point of sales application because the fields of the form which should get filled are not shown on the image:

Sample graphic for form filling project

One week later, he offered the same project again at LinkedIn Pulse (August 26, 2015). Take a look how the conditions are changing in the offers: 


 NATURE OF WORK                          
 NUMBER OF FIELDS            -                        7

 RATE PER FORM                             -           Rs 1.20 Rs

TARGET PER COMPUTER                    -  Unlimited


TARGET FOR 10 COMPUTERS           -   Unlimited

MONTHLY BILLING                                      -     4,00,000 Above


SECURITY DEPOSIT                     -      NIL

DURATION OF CONTRACT             -      11 MONTHS

Sign up & Booking                           -  Online  & Onsite      

FOR MORE DETAILS CALL                     -   9158646476

Thanks & Regards,
Seema Khan { BDM }


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Scammer Exposed

Christopher Caudle likes to get more publicity for Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano
by Rudolf Faix Friday, September 18, 2015 7:21 AM

Christopher Caudle does not understand until now that the article "Scammer Wesley Jon Pollard - - -" is a free expression of my opinion and not an accusation. The difference gets found in the expression "can be". My opinion in this case is based on Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano's accepted and confirmed recommandation from Wesley Jon Pollard at her LinkedIn profile. This recommendation got found on August 25, 2015 on both LinkedIn profiles - Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano and Wesley Jon Pollard. With other words I have only used something to build my opinion what both had written and published in their own profile. If they had published some wrong information then they are guilty by themselves.

Here get the part cited, which Christopher Caudle likes to have removed from my blog. I have made only the "can be" bold to show that it only my opinion and I have added in the brackets the pdf download of the LinkedIn profile from Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano to show that this part is only a copy and paste):

Another partner in crime can be Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano (LinkedIn profile Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano.pdf (686.21 kb)). Wesley Jon Pollard has given her a recommendation beginning with the words “Maria was recently appointed Director with us due to certain qualities she can bring on board that benefit our clients from all around the world ….”. This shows that she has been a director and a decision maker in the organization of Wesley Jon Pollard.

Maria was recently appointed Director with us due to certain qualities she can bring on board that benefit our clients from all around the world. She came highly recommended by a present client who had previously worked very closely with her.

She is very detailed orientated, committed and hard working when it comes to getting clients what they need and always places their first, addressing areas that other brokers cannot offer.

Very unique in many ways, we are very delighted to have Maria on board as a director and look forward to seeing her career being even more successful with us.

Here is a screenshot from the received and accepted recommendations at Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano's LinkedIn profile (content from August 25, 2015):

Screenshot showing recommendations Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano received at LinkedIn

My opinion is that someone is not trustful if he accepts a recommendation because he is thinking it helps in business and if it comes to problems then he is rejecting the content of the recommendation. The reader has in this case the free choice in which part the lie gets found – the recommendation or the reject of the recommendation. Such a behavior can get compared with a flag spinning in the wind.

Christopher Caudle likes to impress in the following letter with a maudlin story and false interpretation of the law. He even addressed the letter wrong to the registrar Network Solutions, LLC. Already this fact shows his misunderstanding of the Internet structures and law interpretation.

Network Solutions, LLC can only take action with respect to a particular domain registration pursuant to (i) a request from the current domain name registrant; (ii) the terms of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“UDRP”) issued by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN”), the international regulatory body that oversees the administration of domain names; or (iii) an order from a court or arbitral tribunal of competent jurisdiction.

Additional is the fact that under the U.S. Communications and Decency Act, an Internet Service Provider or Web host is immune from liability for the content posted on a website by a customer and therefore, neither a registrar nor its affiliates would be a party to any potential court, arbitral or regulatory proceedings. This fact shows his misunderstanding of the law situation too.

The next failure he made is that he is writing that he is "representing Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano" and there is no additional power-of-attorney document attached. Something like that can get written from everybody and everybody can value the content how he likes.

At the beginning of this article I have already explained that the content is only cited from the LinkedIn profiles of Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano and Wesley Jon Pollard. My opinion about the content of the citation with “can be” is nothing else than something "it may be" or "it maybe not". There is nothing where I have written that it is a fact. The fact is only the cited content of the LinkedIn profiles.

One of the fundamental rights in the civilized world is the freedom of expression. There are also countries available where the Internet gets censored. If someone prefers such a living would it be better for him to relocate to such a country. But I'm not sure if he will be able to help in censoring the opinion of others and the Internet.

The letter from Christopher Caudle to Network Solutions, LLC:

Screenshot letter from Christopher Caudle to Network Solutions, LLC page 1

Screenshot letter from Christopher Caudle to Network Solutions, LLC page 2

Other articles about the case around Wesley Jon Pollard:


The red herring and/or deception around Wesley Jon Pollard
by Rudolf Faix Saturday, September 12, 2015 7:35 AM

A person with the Facebook profile calling himself Bruce Young shared on September 11,  2015 06:16pm (GMT+2) with Christopher Claude my LinkedIn posting where I had in the comments section a communication with Wesley Jon Pollard and explained him that hiding himself in anonymity is not good base for making business. I also explained him my motivation for hunting scammers.

The content from Bruce Young:

Check this out

The big investigator, police man (Sargent) and Sherlock Holmes from Eynsham did even not follow the link and posted his flames against me into the comment, because he has been thinking that Bruce Young sent him the link with the article “Is Christopher Caudle more than just a friend of the alleged scammer Wesley Jon Pollard?”.

By taking a look at the Facebook profile of Bruce Young I find the first 17 postings done on August 22, 2015. On the same day he has created a page with the name “Scammers Beware”, which has until now only 8 likes and two postings – the self-promotion of the page - done on August 22, 2015.

August 23, 2015: Bruce Young started his Facebook campaign where he is searching for Wesley Jon Pollard.

On September 10, 2015 Bruce Young published the first time a transcript of the Skype communication with Wesley Jon Poilard. This communication is dated from August 21, 2015.

Christopher Claude reported Wesley Jon Pollard in a forwarded email to me on August 26, 2015 as missing since July 7, 2015 – the email is dated with July 30, 2015. A copy of the email gets found in the updates from August 26, 2015 at the article “Scammer Wesley Jon Pollard - - -

My opinion about the rumors around Wesley Jon Pollards disappearance is nothing else than a red herring or a deception:

  • Someone, who communicated per Skype on August 21 will not get searched two days later already.

  • Someone, who needs to hide, will not get in contact by using Skype with people from which he is hiding.

  • Someone, who needs to hide, will not use his old and existing accounts for offers of his new company ( for the case he did it not by a mistake.

  • Someone, who has nothing to hide, does not need to block me at LinkedIn
    Here a screenshot from Wesley Jon Pollards public profile when I'm logged in as Rudolf Faix at LinkedIn:
    Screenshot shows that Wesley Jon Pollard has blocked me on LinkedIn

    And here a screeshot from the same time, using another browser, without beeing logged in:
    Screenshot of the public LinkedIn profile without loginBlocking someone on LinkedIn does not really help. It makes the person only more suspicious. Everybody has a lot of friends and sometimes others are giving you access for searching some information. In such a case the blocking gets dismantled easily.

It is also my opinion that if somebody is searching for Wesley Jon Pollard he will find him at the place of the people whose name should get removed from the publicity or which are making the most rumors. For me it looks like that the profile from Bruce Young with the picture from the wrestler and actor “The Rock” Dwayne Johnson, got only created for helping Wesley Jon Pollard. I think that even the published pictures from Wesley Jon Pollard are only a fake and are showing in reality someone else.

Other articles about the case around Wesley Jon Pollard:


Bruce-Young-Chris-Caudle-message.pdf (231.25 kb)

Facebook-profile-Bruce-Young.pdf (6.39 mb)

LinkedIn-posting-Call-center-owners-dont-start-working-without-a-security-deposit-given-by-the-client.pdf (152.52 kb)

Update Jan. 18, 2017:
Link from the Facebook profile Christopher Claude ( removed as it returns error 404 - not found.


Is Christopher Caudle more than just a friend of the alleged scammer Wesley Jon Pollard?
by Rudolf Faix Thursday, September 10, 2015 11:15 AM

Christopher CaudleIt seems that Christopher Caudle does not understand the difference of a presumption ( “can be”, “seems to be”) and a fact (“is a”). It doesn’t matter what he understands and what not. Interesting is his actual connection to the disappeared and putative scammer Wesley Jon Pollard.

He expressed himself in an email July 30, 2015 (found in the update from August 26, 2015), which he has forwarded to me on August 26, 2015:

I have known Wesley Jon Pollard for many years. He lives in the Philippines and owns the company mentioned, which has a large number of important clients on his books. He arranges call centres for his clients, and makes a point of visiting each one to vet the company and ensure their procedures match their application.

Christopher CaudleWe find in the LinkedIn profile “Lord Caudle” (Lord-Caudle-LinkedIn.pdf (459.36 kb)) that he is CEO of Chat Network Plc since March 2011 and Chairman from Surecall Telecoms Ltd since the year 2010. He got for both jobs recommendations, one from a Turkish and one from an Indian LinkedIn member. The recommendations got given in exchange.

Praveen George from India got a recommendation from “Lord Caudle” on March 26, 2014 and has written a recommendation for “Lord Caudle” on March 27, 2014.

Riz Balloch from Turkey has gotten a recommendation from “Lord Caudle” on April 13, 2012 and got a recommendation from “Lord Caudle” back on the same day. In this case cannot get determined which recommendation was written first.

Coincidentally Wesley Jon Pollard has published yesterday (September 9, 2015) a post in LinkedIn Pulse (Wesley-Jon-Pollard-Addressing-what-needs-are-required-for-a-successful-sales-website.pdf (206.19 kb)). In this article he offers 24 hour live chat services of – a site registered in the high risk country (ScamAdviser) Pakistan with an U.S. phone number:

So this is the final and fifth part in our post episode on what a successful 24 hour support service such as ourselves can do for your websites sales and customers service side, since we are 100% committed to delivering a successful outcome month in and months out, 365 days a week for all our clients.

At a page gets found with the title “lord chris caudle's Page” (.pdf (197.20 kb)). The page has the first entry from February 2, 2012 (.pdf (180.64 kb)) and the last entry from September 10, 2014.

In my view, are here occurring too many coincidences. Each normal thinking person will ask the following questions:

  • Are Christopher Caudle and Wesley Jon Pollard more than friends?

  • Why is Wesley Jon Pollard offering the same kind of business at the same time like Christopher Caudle?

  • Which role takes Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano that Christopher Caudle likes to get her name from the article "Scammer Wesley Jon Pollard - - -" removed? This article was merely quoted from LinkedIn profiles parts which Maria herself has accepted or written. Others may probably have similar considerations when they are reading the profiles carefully.

  • Is the whole case, not just a red herring? Especially if taking a look which countries are all involved in this case: Philippines (ROLLINGDICE PHILIPPINES), India (ROLLINGDICE PUNE), Pakistan (domain, UK, USA (actual profile and phone number used in advertisings), etc.

  • If Wesley Jon Pollard is on a escape he would not be so stupid and use his old accounts (LinkedIn, Twitter and Pinterest) and his own name for making money to finance his escape. For the case that the authorities are searching for him would it be very easily to locate him by his IP address using for posting the articles. Why should he give the hints to the authorities by himself if he is on escape? I think that Wesley Jon Pollard has helpers, which are publishing his articles. Who are these helpers in this case?

  • Christopher Caudle writes by himself in his mail from July 29, 2015 (found in the update from August 26, 2015 of the article "Scammer Wesley Jon Pollard - - -"): “I wish to report Wesley Jon Pollard owner of Out of the Box solutions, as missing presumed kidnaped, since 7th July 2015”. Who should kidnap him and for which reason? The offshore outsourcing business is down, there is not much to earn. Who shall pay in this case the ransom?

    Another statement from Christopher Caudle:
    It is my opinion having served for 10 years with the British Police (now retired) that Wesley Jon Pollard was not in India and never arrived there, I do not believe he was in Malaysia either, and that he is somewhere in the Philippines possibly kidnapped.
    I think that each one knows that the Philipines are an island state. You can leave the Philippines only by using a ship or an airplane. In both cases you'll be listed as crew member or as a passenger if you are leaving the Philippines on a legal way. The authorities would check this database. The opinion from Christopher Caudle shows only his missing geographical knowledge and his missing talent in investigating.

  • Wesley Jon Pollard has been looking today (September 10, 2015) at 10:35am (Manila time) - 3:35am UK time at my LinkedIn profile.

  • If Wesley Jon Pollard disappeared on July 7, 2015 like Christopher Caudle has written it, how can it be that Bruce Young had a communication with Wesley Jon Pollard on August 21, 2015 (Facebook posting of Bruce Young.pdf (150.80 kb))?
    A transcript of a conversation between my two friends;

    21/08/2015 00:03:40] Wesley Pollard: Mate payment will be at the end of the month
    [21/08/2015 00:03:41] FRIEND1: I plea to you Wes to understand my fears and my apprehension. I look up to you.
    [21/08/2015 00:06:43] FRIEND1: to be completely honest and open, here's my fear Wes; that I will no longer hear from you after today, no date has been set as when I can received it, meaning there is no projection as to when the money is coming in, if indeed there was a need to wait on...that's my fear Wes, and it is my fault that I trusted you too early despite advises from friends
    [21/08/2015 00:07:13] FRIEND1: please understand
    [21/08/2015 00:07:51] Wesley Pollard: You will have it by the end of the month ok

    SO WHERE IS IT NOW? NON PAYMENT. end of month of what year?
    If Bruce Young has chatted on August 21, 2015 with Wesley Jon Pollard, why sends me Christopher Caudle on August 26, 2015 the message that Wesley Jon Pollard "disappeared, properly kidnapped on July 7"?

Exactly all this facts are making the full story for me very supicious. I think that it is nothing else than red herring.

Other articles in the connection with the case about Wesley Jon Pollard:


Lord-Caudle-LinkedIn.pdf (459.36 kb)

Wesley-Jon-Pollard-Addressing-what-needs-are-required-for-a-successful-sales-website.pdf (206.19 kb)

lord-chris-caudle's-Page-CampaignProvider.pdf (197.20 kb)

Lord-Chris-Caudle-(NEW)-UK-PPI-Personal-Injury-Sales-Process.pdf (180.64 kb)

Facebook-Bruce-Young-A-transcript-of-a-conversation.pdf (150.80 kb)


Scammer: SHR Solution - - Vikram Pratap Singh
by Rudolf Faix Tuesday, September 8, 2015 5:39 AM

LinkedIn profile graphic of Kashyap BhattThe "Scammer: Vikram Pratap Singh - SCISOLUTIONS.US, ALDIABLOS.US, ALDIABLOS.COM and SHRSOLUTION.ORG" is still active and tries to sell dreams to call centers. For offering these dreams he likes to get a dream charge, sorry he calls it consultancy charges, of INR 300,000 (~US$ 4,488.80). It looks like the scammer needs urgent a lot of money!

Until now Vikram Pratap Singh did not get it that the personal computer is nearly 40 years old and that in the civilized countries are for this reason no form filling projects available. All forms are getting generated from computers and there are no forms which need to get manually filled. Additional are consumer data protected by the law in the traditional outsourcing countries and the fines for breaking this law are very high so that not one company will take the risk and would outsource (not onshore and not offshore) their data processing. Health and bank data are very sensible data and have additional a special protection from the law in the traditional outsourcing countries.

Typical for each scammer is that he cannot show his face in his LinkedIn profile. The reason for this is very simple - the scammer does not like to provide a manhunt picture by himself.

The email from

From: Kashyap Bhatt []
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 1:11 PM
To: 'Kashyap Bhatt' <>
Subject: Health Insurance Form Filling



We are outsourcing company located in Ahmedabad . We also have existence in country such as USA, UK, Singapore and cities in India.

We have a tie up with client in US, UK, Canada, Australia and we can outsource their process to you.

In some of these processes we are the direct client located in India and take sole responsibility for your payment.

We charge you a consultancy fee for the processes that are given. All processes are genuine and free of risk.

Awaiting your reply.

Please see details of the project.

Health Insurance Form Filling


Project Description:

  • Payout = INR 20 Per Form (Inclusive ST)
  • Work load: 4000 forms/ Week For 1 Slot
  • Weekly Payment.
  • The forms need to be filled in to the software that will be provided.
  • The type of data needed to fill would be from an image or a PDF file.
  • Training will be provided online/onsite (Onsite training travel and other charges to be borne by the centre).
  • 1 Slot = 10 seats.
  • Contract Period : 11 month
  • Submission period: 6 days
  • QC Report: 5 day
  • Consultancy charges : 3,00,000/-INR

      Feel free contact me for any queries.

Thanks & Regards,
Kashyap Bhatt
+91 70960 25070
SHR Solution
Skype : kashyap.bhatt26

The email headers:

Received: by with SMTP id 91csp1330143qgj;

        Mon, 7 Sep 2015 04:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by with SMTP id d9mr14124791oes.17.1441624293557;
       Mon, 07 Sep 2015 04:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <>
Received: from ( [])
       by with ESMTPS id d5si3090941oer.56.2015.
       (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
       Mon, 07 Sep 2015 04:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass ( domain of designates as permitted sender) client-ip=;
      spf=pass ( domain of designates as permitted sender);
Message-ID: <>
X-Google-Original-Message-ID: <001201d0e95d$e61c2960$b2547c20$>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=default;
               h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=yF8LvM59SYISCTn1O+X1NmYw7JMpfwXrjcGJfh+ikeQ=;
Received: from [] (port=54323 helo=ABADEKaushikG)
               by with esmtpa (Exim 4.85)
               (envelope-from <>)
               id 1ZYuKL-0007MI-05; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 07:11:15 -0400
From: "Kashyap Bhatt" <>
To: "'Kashyap Bhatt'" <>
Subject: Health Insurance Form Filling
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 16:40:31 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdDkrNmCOKLefxifQtyWWbnWVV30zA==
x-cr-puzzleid: {A037348E-73F7-4DCA-99E8-A2911CC0D1E6}
Content-Language: en-us
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname -
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain -
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain -
X-EsetId: 37303A296EDFC361637664

The actual domain registration data from

Registry Domain ID: D168825547-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server:
Registrar URL:
Update Date: 2015-05-31T12:27:25Z
Creation Date: 2013-05-30T15:00:02Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2016-05-30T15:00:02Z
Registrar:, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email:
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: CR144307266
Registrant Name: Registration Private
Registrant Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Registrant Street:
Registrant Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Registrant City: Scottsdale
Registrant State/Province: Arizona
Registrant Postal Code: 85260
Registrant Country: United States
Registrant Phone: +1.4806242599
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax: +1.4806242598
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email:
Registry Admin ID: CR144307268
Admin Name: Registration Private
Admin Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Admin Street:
Admin Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Admin City: Scottsdale
Admin State/Province: Arizona
Admin Postal Code: 85260
Admin Country: United States
Admin Phone: +1.4806242599
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax: +1.4806242598
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email:
Registry Tech ID: CR144307267
Tech Name: Registration Private
Tech Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Tech Street:
Tech Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Tech City: Scottsdale
Tech State/Province: Arizona
Tech Postal Code: 85260
Tech Country: United States
Tech Phone: +1.4806242599
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax: +1.4806242598
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email:
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System:
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2015-09-07T22:00:00Z <<<

Update Jan. 18, 2017: Links for the domain and to the removed as they don't exists anymore.


Filter by APML


I'm since more then 35 years in the computer business (programming and technical support) and using the Internet since it has started. Since 2002 I'm programming solutions for Asterisk and since 2004 I'm in the call center industry.


All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. I make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis and is only representing my own opinion. By browsing or using content from this site you accept the full legal disclaimer of this website.