Offshore Outsourcing & Scammer

For me it look like that the bpo center owners are the stupidest people of the world, because in another case the following spam email offer from the scammer "Star Technologies" would not have any chance to get accepted by one of them.

Let us first take a look at the spam email from the scammer:

From: Star Technologies [mailto:getintouch.startechnologies@outlook.com]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 8:16 PM
Subject: Non-Voice Process (Without Accuracy)‏‏‏

“Greetings”

We are very happy to introduce you with our company Star Technologies which has been in the business of Outsourcing to Centers looking to run Process / Campaigns.

This E-mail received by you is regarding a simple Campaign.

 

CAMPAIGN INFO

Campaign name: Commercial Loan Form Filling process (Data Entry Non Voice process)

Commercial Loan Form Filling process

Payout: $1400 USD Per agent / Per Month (The Payout offered from the Client end will be fixed for Each Employee / Agent every month.)

Contract: The Fixed Pay would be payable to the Center from the Client until the Ongoing Contract

Valid for the time period mentioned, also the Contract can be renewed for next 3 years after renegotiation based on the quality and productivity offered by the Center.

Security: The Letter of Credit or Bank Guarantee will be provided from the Client end for the purpose of the Centers Security.

Payout Structure: The Monthly Payments to the Center will done through International Wire Transfer, there will be no deduction or Hold of any payments carried, but do Inform us of your mistakes so that they are not repeated. If needed, the data will Send back for rework.

 

Info For Centers

Agents require to work on Online URL

URL & Data Provided from the Client end

Demo Form and Demo Data for the Campaign will be provided to Center on their request.

 

Requirements of the Client to be fulfilled by the Center:

Client wants each Employee / Agent to Fill 22 Forms Per Day, Per Agent.

The Working Hours will be of 8 hours per day.

Working days will be Monday to Friday (Weekdays) Saturday & Sunday (Weekends) will be Granted off.

Working Times will be 07am to 03pm (IST) for the Day Shift.

The Training and the instruction sheets will be Provided by the Client.

The Training of the Center provided from the Client will be ongoing for 5 Working days.

The training period won’t be counted in the Billing.

The training which will be provided by the Client will be nothing but a Dummy Training.

 

Commercial Involved

Business Procurement Charges

Royalty Not Charged

 

Please feel free to communicate with us and avail Consultation.

You may Email us at :-getintouch.startechnologies@gmail.com / getintouch.startechnologies@outlook.com

or Add us on Skype at :- getintouch.startechnologies to discuss further regarding the process as per your convenience.

Warm Regards

Star Technologies

This email is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you should not read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the information in this email. Please also email, telephone or fax us immediately and delete the message from your system.Email may be susceptible to data corruption, interception and unauthorized amendment, and we do not accept liability for any such corruption, interception or amendment or the consequences thereof. You should carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment.

** Please consider the environment before printing this email **

The above email is nothing else than spam from a scammer. The offer is for the following reasons nothing else than anadvanced fee scam:

1. Not one company uses free email addresses for sending their offers
   
   
2. Not one company is sending emails only by using their company name. The staff of the company is sending emails. The name of the person, which sent this email, is missing.
   
   
3. Typical for a scammer is that he writes everything in bold letters. He is afraid that something can get overseen.
   
   
4. It seems that the scammer does not have any education and have never seen a bank (loan department) from inside. In such a case he would know that such forms are getting filled directly at the front desk from the bank staff. The customer needs only to sign the printout. How can such a process get outsourced?
   
   
5. The missing education and knowledge of the scammer gets found in the fact that loan form data are highly protected by the law in the traditional outsourcing countries (Australia, European Union, USA). Such data are not allowed to leave the bank office. Rejected loan forms and data need to get destroyed immediately as soon the case is closed. Not one bank will take the risk and outsource such a kind of data processing.
   
   
6. Borrowers are normally taking loans from the bank where they are already well known. The success rate for getting the loan is much higher than trying to get the loan from another bank. In such a case the full and relevant business history is already stored in the bank computer and no manual action (form filling) is necessary.
   
   
7. With the words "Commercial Involved" and "Business Procurement Charges" confirms the scammer that he has no contract with any client and for this no income. With other words are the requested fees or charges are nothing else than invention fees or scammer surviving fees.
   
   
8. A search for "Star Technologies" at the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in India returned the results Star Technologies and Systems Private Limited from Patna, Bihar and Star Technologies Private Limited from Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. Both locations are far away from the place where I have located the scammer today with the IP addresses (Skype resolver) 123.136.154.168 and 123.136.155.23. Both IP addresses are locate in the area of Gugal Pimpari - southwest of Washim - far away from the companies found at the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
   
   
9. Not one outsourcing client will search for a broker or consultant in a low wage country. A broker or consultant get searched local at the place of the the client. The broker or consultant will get paid from the client directly. If some client is searching abroad then he will search for center doing his work directly and save in this case the money for the broker or consultant.

A BPO center owner who wants to have such an offer, can only blame himself if he is gets cheated. My compassion is very limited in such a case. Some people need to learn their business by using the hard way.

It seems that the scammer Munna Shaikh needs urgently money and for this reason he has invented a form filling campaign.  Like each scammer he cannot show his face and uses instead a stolen graphic as profile picture. He does not like to provide a manhunt picture by himself.  He provides only one contact possibility - an Indian phone number – besides the email address he uses at the moment.  With other words everything is prepared for a fast disappearing.

With the statement “SO AT LEAST, WE MUST EARN SOME THING ON PROJECTS” in his email he declares by himself, that he does not have any contract with the client and that he is a scammer. With this statement he is declaring that at least he – the scammer - has to earn an invention fee paid by the center. A client which hires a broker has to pay the broker!

The LinkedIn mail from the Scammer Munna Shaikh:

*Dear Centers,*
Please find the below Reliance online form filling process details.

** *Reliance Form Filling Process*****

*Description:***A To fill the details of new connection into the

company's online portal with provided login ids & pwds.
Each form will contain 20 entries .

*Time Consumption: *30 to 40 seconds per form

Consultancy charges: - Rs 1,00,000/- +12.36 % Service tax paid { Not Adjust Billing }
Royalty :- 10 %

Work load : Unlimited

Nature of work : form filling

*Payout : 6 Rs per form *

Training Provided Online

Sign Up :- Online / Onsite

Billing cycle: Monthly (after raising invoice 15 days)

Monthly Billing:3 Lac - 4 Lacs/ Slot center can

get approximately depending on agents performance.

Available slots: 02


NOTE :- Only Interested Center Apply


*CALL US FOR BOOKING OR AGREEMENT ON : *9158646476
FROM* "

*Thanks & Regards.*
Seema Khan
BDM
Mob:9158646476
*join me on whatsup .*9158646476

SMALL INVESTMENT FOR PROFITABLE PROJECTS BUT GOOD BILLING .

WHY SHOULD WE WASTE MONEY AND TIME ON FAKE PROJECTS IN BPO MARKET ? SO AT LEAST , WE MUST EARN SOME THING ON PROJECTS . WE ARE PROVIDING SMALL BUDGET PROJECTS FOR YOU ,PLZ CALL US 9158646476 OR

BUSINESS DEALING FACE 2 FACE IN OFFICE , ONCE YOU SATISFIED THEN YOU CAN GO AHEAD FOR TAKING THE PROJECTS .

"DONT MISS THIS EARNING AND PROFITABLE CHANCE FOR YOUR BUSINESS"

The scammer Munna Shaikh offered the same campaign already at LinkedIn Pulse on August 18, 2015 with a screenshot. The screenshot shows a point of sales application because the fields of the form which should get filled are not shown on the image:

One week later, he offered the same project again at LinkedIn Pulse (August 26, 2015). Take a look how the conditions are changing in the offers: 

RELIANCE ONLINE FORM FILLING

 
 NATURE OF WORK                          
        ENTERING DETAILS OF CUSTOMERS IN SOFTWARE PROVIDED BY RELIANCE
 NUMBER OF FIELDS            -                        7

 RATE PER FORM                             -           Rs 1.20 Rs

TARGET PER COMPUTER                    -  Unlimited

NUMBER OF COMPUTERS REQUIRED     -  Min 10

TARGET FOR 10 COMPUTERS           -   Unlimited

MONTHLY BILLING                                      -     4,00,000 Above

BUSINESS PROCUREMENT FEES      -   RS. 40 k ONLY

SECURITY DEPOSIT                     -      NIL

DURATION OF CONTRACT             -      11 MONTHS

Sign up & Booking                           -  Online  & Onsite      

LAST DATE FOR BOOKING THE WORK
FOR MORE DETAILS CALL                     -   9158646476

Thanks & Regards,
Seema Khan { BDM }
9158646476

Christopher Caudle does not understand until now that the article "Scammer Wesley Jon Pollard - outoftheboxsolutions.weebly.com - dexterity-leads.com - rollingdice.in" is a free expression of my opinion and not an accusation. The difference gets found in the expression "can be". My opinion in this case is based on Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano's accepted and confirmed recommandation from Wesley Jon Pollard at her LinkedIn profile. This recommendation got found on August 25, 2015 on both LinkedIn profiles - Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano and Wesley Jon Pollard. With other words I have only used something to build my opinion what both had written and published in their own profile. If they had published some wrong information then they are guilty by themselves.

Here get the part cited, which Christopher Caudle likes to have removed from my blog. I have made only the "can be" bold to show that it only my opinion and I have added in the brackets the pdf download of the LinkedIn profile from Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano to show that this part is only a copy and paste):

Another partner in crime can be Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano (LinkedIn profile Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano.pdf (686.21 kb)). Wesley Jon Pollard has given her a recommendation beginning with the words “Maria was recently appointed Director with us due to certain qualities she can bring on board that benefit our clients from all around the world ….”. This shows that she has been a director and a decision maker in the organization of Wesley Jon Pollard.

Maria was recently appointed Director with us due to certain qualities she can bring on board that benefit our clients from all around the world. She came highly recommended by a present client who had previously worked very closely with her.

She is very detailed orientated, committed and hard working when it comes to getting clients what they need and always places their first, addressing areas that other brokers cannot offer.

Very unique in many ways, we are very delighted to have Maria on board as a director and look forward to seeing her career being even more successful with us.

Here is a screenshot from the received and accepted recommendations at Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano's LinkedIn profile (content from August 25, 2015):

My opinion is that someone is not trustful if he accepts a recommendation because he is thinking it helps in business and if it comes to problems then he is rejecting the content of the recommendation. The reader has in this case the free choice in which part the lie gets found – the recommendation or the reject of the recommendation. Such a behavior can get compared with a flag spinning in the wind.

Christopher Caudle likes to impress in the following letter with a maudlin story and false interpretation of the law. He even addressed the letter wrong to the registrar Network Solutions, LLC. Already this fact shows his misunderstanding of the Internet structures and law interpretation.

Network Solutions, LLC can only take action with respect to a particular domain registration pursuant to (i) a request from the current domain name registrant; (ii) the terms of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“UDRP”) issued by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN”), the international regulatory body that oversees the administration of domain names; or (iii) an order from a court or arbitral tribunal of competent jurisdiction.

Additional is the fact that under the U.S. Communications and Decency Act, an Internet Service Provider or Web host is immune from liability for the content posted on a website by a customer and therefore, neither a registrar nor its affiliates would be a party to any potential court, arbitral or regulatory proceedings. This fact shows his misunderstanding of the law situation too.

The next failure he made is that he is writing that he is "representing Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano" and there is no additional power-of-attorney document attached. Something like that can get written from everybody and everybody can value the content how he likes.

At the beginning of this article I have already explained that the content is only cited from the LinkedIn profiles of Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano and Wesley Jon Pollard. My opinion about the content of the citation with “can be” is nothing else than something "it may be" or "it maybe not". There is nothing where I have written that it is a fact. The fact is only the cited content of the LinkedIn profiles.

One of the fundamental rights in the civilized world is the freedom of expression. There are also countries available where the Internet gets censored. If someone prefers such a living would it be better for him to relocate to such a country. But I'm not sure if he will be able to help in censoring the opinion of others and the Internet.

The letter from Christopher Caudle to Network Solutions, LLC:

Other articles about the case around Wesley Jon Pollard:

• Scammer Wesley Jon Pollard - outoftheboxsolutions.weebly.com - dexterity-leads.com - rollingdice.in
• Is Christopher Caudle more than just a friend of the alleged scammer Wesley Jon Pollard?
• The red herring and/or deception around Wesley Jon Pollard

A person with the Facebook profile calling himself Bruce Young shared on September 11,  2015 06:16pm (GMT+2) with Christopher Claude my LinkedIn posting where I had in the comments section a communication with Wesley Jon Pollard and explained him that hiding himself in anonymity is not good base for making business. I also explained him my motivation for hunting scammers.

The content from Bruce Young:

Check this out https://www.linkedin.com/grp/post/3703199-5969350618647638019

The big investigator, police man (Sargent) and Sherlock Holmes from Eynsham did even not follow the link and posted his flames against me into the comment, because he has been thinking that Bruce Young sent him the link with the article “Is Christopher Caudle more than just a friend of the alleged scammer Wesley Jon Pollard?”.

By taking a look at the Facebook profile of Bruce Young I find the first 17 postings done on August 22, 2015. On the same day he has created a page with the name “Scammers Beware”, which has until now only 8 likes and two postings – the self-promotion of the page - done on August 22, 2015.

August 23, 2015: Bruce Young started his Facebook campaign where he is searching for Wesley Jon Pollard.

On September 10, 2015 Bruce Young published the first time a transcript of the Skype communication with Wesley Jon Poilard. This communication is dated from August 21, 2015.

Christopher Claude reported Wesley Jon Pollard in a forwarded email to me on August 26, 2015 as missing since July 7, 2015 – the email is dated with July 30, 2015. A copy of the email gets found in the updates from August 26, 2015 at the article “Scammer Wesley Jon Pollard - outoftheboxsolutions.weebly.com - dexterity-leads.com - rollingdice.in”

My opinion about the rumors around Wesley Jon Pollards disappearance is nothing else than a red herring or a deception:

• Someone, who communicated per Skype on August 21 will not get searched two days later already.
  
  
• Someone, who needs to hide, will not get in contact by using Skype with people from which he is hiding.
  
  
• Someone, who needs to hide, will not use his old and existing accounts for offers of his new company (dexterity-leads.com) for the case he did it not by a mistake.
  
  
• Someone, who has nothing to hide, does not need to block me at LinkedIn
  Here a screenshot from Wesley Jon Pollards public profile when I'm logged in as Rudolf Faix at LinkedIn:
  
  
  And here a screeshot from the same time, using another browser, without beeing logged in:
  Blocking someone on LinkedIn does not really help. It makes the person only more suspicious. Everybody has a lot of friends and sometimes others are giving you access for searching some information. In such a case the blocking gets dismantled easily.

It is also my opinion that if somebody is searching for Wesley Jon Pollard he will find him at the place of the people whose name should get removed from the publicity or which are making the most rumors. For me it looks like that the profile from Bruce Young with the picture from the wrestler and actor “The Rock” Dwayne Johnson, got only created for helping Wesley Jon Pollard. I think that even the published pictures from Wesley Jon Pollard are only a fake and are showing in reality someone else.

Other articles about the case around Wesley Jon Pollard:

• Scammer Wesley Jon Pollard - outoftheboxsolutions.weebly.com - dexterity-leads.com - rollingdice.in
• Is Christopher Caudle more than just a friend of the alleged scammer Wesley Jon Pollard?
• Christopher Caudle likes to get more publicity for Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano

Bruce-Young-Chris-Caudle-message.pdf (231.25 kb)

Facebook-profile-Bruce-Young.pdf (6.39 mb)

LinkedIn-posting-Call-center-owners-dont-start-working-without-a-security-deposit-given-by-the-client.pdf (152.52 kb)

Update Jan. 18, 2017:
Link from the Facebook profile Christopher Claude (https://www.facebook.com/chrisdevelop) removed as it returns error 404 - not found.

It seems that Christopher Caudle does not understand the difference of a presumption ( “can be”, “seems to be”) and a fact (“is a”). It doesn’t matter what he understands and what not. Interesting is his actual connection to the disappeared and putative scammer Wesley Jon Pollard.

He expressed himself in an email July 30, 2015 (found in the update from August 26, 2015), which he has forwarded to me on August 26, 2015:

I have known Wesley Jon Pollard for many years. He lives in the Philippines and owns the company mentioned, which has a large number of important clients on his books. He arranges call centres for his clients, and makes a point of visiting each one to vet the company and ensure their procedures match their application.

We find in the LinkedIn profile “Lord Caudle” (Lord-Caudle-LinkedIn.pdf (459.36 kb)) that he is CEO of Chat Network Plc since March 2011 and Chairman from Surecall Telecoms Ltd since the year 2010. He got for both jobs recommendations, one from a Turkish and one from an Indian LinkedIn member. The recommendations got given in exchange.

Praveen George from India got a recommendation from “Lord Caudle” on March 26, 2014 and has written a recommendation for “Lord Caudle” on March 27, 2014.

Riz Balloch from Turkey has gotten a recommendation from “Lord Caudle” on April 13, 2012 and got a recommendation from “Lord Caudle” back on the same day. In this case cannot get determined which recommendation was written first.

Coincidentally Wesley Jon Pollard has published yesterday (September 9, 2015) a post in LinkedIn Pulse (Wesley-Jon-Pollard-Addressing-what-needs-are-required-for-a-successful-sales-website.pdf (206.19 kb)). In this article he offers 24 hour live chat services of dexterity-leads.com – a site registered in the high risk country (ScamAdviser) Pakistan with an U.S. phone number:

So this is the final and fifth part in our post episode on what a successful 24 hour support service such as ourselves can do for your websites sales and customers service side, since we are 100% committed to delivering a successful outcome month in and months out, 365 days a week for all our clients.

At Campaignprovider.com a page gets found with the title “lord chris caudle's Page” (.pdf (197.20 kb)). The page has the first entry from February 2, 2012 (.pdf (180.64 kb)) and the last entry from September 10, 2014.

In my view, are here occurring too many coincidences. Each normal thinking person will ask the following questions:

• Are Christopher Caudle and Wesley Jon Pollard more than friends?
  
  
• Why is Wesley Jon Pollard offering the same kind of business at the same time like Christopher Caudle?
  
  
• Which role takes Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano that Christopher Caudle likes to get her name from the article "Scammer Wesley Jon Pollard - outoftheboxsolutions.weebly.com - dexterity-leads.com - rollingdice.in" removed? This article was merely quoted from LinkedIn profiles parts which Maria herself has accepted or written. Others may probably have similar considerations when they are reading the profiles carefully.
  
  
• Is the whole case, not just a red herring? Especially if taking a look which countries are all involved in this case: Philippines (ROLLINGDICE PHILIPPINES), India (ROLLINGDICE PUNE), Pakistan (domain dexterity-leads.com), UK, USA (actual profile and phone number used in advertisings), etc.
  
  
• If Wesley Jon Pollard is on a escape he would not be so stupid and use his old accounts (LinkedIn, Twitter and Pinterest) and his own name for making money to finance his escape. For the case that the authorities are searching for him would it be very easily to locate him by his IP address using for posting the articles. Why should he give the hints to the authorities by himself if he is on escape? I think that Wesley Jon Pollard has helpers, which are publishing his articles. Who are these helpers in this case?
  
  
• Christopher Caudle writes by himself in his mail from July 29, 2015 (found in the update from August 26, 2015 of the article "Scammer Wesley Jon Pollard - outoftheboxsolutions.weebly.com - dexterity-leads.com - rollingdice.in"): “I wish to report Wesley Jon Pollard owner of Out of the Box solutions, as missing presumed kidnaped, since 7th July 2015”. Who should kidnap him and for which reason? The offshore outsourcing business is down, there is not much to earn. Who shall pay in this case the ransom?
  
  Another statement from Christopher Caudle:
  

  It is my opinion having served for 10 years with the British Police (now retired) that Wesley Jon Pollard was not in India and never arrived there, I do not believe he was in Malaysia either, and that he is somewhere in the Philippines possibly kidnapped.

  I think that each one knows that the Philipines are an island state. You can leave the Philippines only by using a ship or an airplane. In both cases you'll be listed as crew member or as a passenger if you are leaving the Philippines on a legal way. The authorities would check this database. The opinion from Christopher Caudle shows only his missing geographical knowledge and his missing talent in investigating.
  
  
• Wesley Jon Pollard has been looking today (September 10, 2015) at 10:35am (Manila time) - 3:35am UK time at my LinkedIn profile.
  
  
• If Wesley Jon Pollard disappeared on July 7, 2015 like Christopher Caudle has written it, how can it be that Bruce Young had a communication with Wesley Jon Pollard on August 21, 2015 (Facebook posting of Bruce Young, .pdf (150.80 kb))?
  

  A transcript of a conversation between my two friends;
  
  21/08/2015 00:03:40] Wesley Pollard: Mate payment will be at the end of the month
  [21/08/2015 00:03:41] FRIEND1: I plea to you Wes to understand my fears and my apprehension. I look up to you.
  [21/08/2015 00:06:43] FRIEND1: to be completely honest and open, here's my fear Wes; that I will no longer hear from you after today, no date has been set as when I can received it, meaning there is no projection as to when the money is coming in, if indeed there was a need to wait on...that's my fear Wes, and it is my fault that I trusted you too early despite advises from friends
  [21/08/2015 00:07:13] FRIEND1: please understand
  [21/08/2015 00:07:51] Wesley Pollard: You will have it by the end of the month ok
  
  SO WHERE IS IT NOW? NON PAYMENT. end of month of what year?

  If Bruce Young has chatted on August 21, 2015 with Wesley Jon Pollard, why sends me Christopher Caudle on August 26, 2015 the message that Wesley Jon Pollard "disappeared, properly kidnapped on July 7"?

Exactly all this facts are making the full story for me very supicious. I think that it is nothing else than red herring.

Other articles in the connection with the case about Wesley Jon Pollard:

• Scammer Wesley Jon Pollard - outoftheboxsolutions.weebly.com - dexterity-leads.com - rollingdice.in
• The red herring and/or deception around Wesley Jon Pollard – out-of-the-box-solutions
• Christopher Caudle likes to get more publicity for Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano

Lord-Caudle-LinkedIn.pdf (459.36 kb)

Wesley-Jon-Pollard-Addressing-what-needs-are-required-for-a-successful-sales-website.pdf (206.19 kb)

lord-chris-caudle's-Page-CampaignProvider.pdf (197.20 kb)

Lord-Chris-Caudle-(NEW)-UK-PPI-Personal-Injury-Sales-Process.pdf (180.64 kb)

Facebook-Bruce-Young-A-transcript-of-a-conversation.pdf (150.80 kb)