Like every scammer has been Paul Rowe unhappy about my results. After my last article "Scammer: Castle Pension Solutions - castlepensionsolutions.co.uk - Paul Rowe - Nick Danks", Paul Rowe has sent me an email about his ideas. The content is similar like I'm receiving it from every other scammer. Even in the email is his full name missing and does not really represent a company or what someone can expect from a correspondence with a serious company.
Read it by yourself:
In business life is only that real, which is written down. Every spoken promises need to get into a written form that they are provable. It is true, that I don't know him and I'm glad that I have never done some business with Castle Pension Solutions. I have taken only the written words for showing that he is a scammer.
Before I go into the quality of work, which he is complaining, I list the facts, which are given from the UK government sites.
The UK Companies House warns on her website about the scamming methods, which Castle Penison Solutions is using.:
Scams are promoted using terms such as an offer of unique investment opportunities, free pension review, legal loophole, cash bonus or as a government endorsed scheme and victims are being approached via cold calling, text message or in person door to door. You should treat all approaches about your pension with caution if it is not from a source that you recognise and trust.
If you are approached, do not share your personal information or sign any paperwork. You are able to check whether the offer of service is genuine and the Pension Advisory Service website can help.
A search for Castle Pension Solutions and Paul Rowe at Companies House, the Fincancial Service Register and the Interim Permission Consumer Credit Register remains without result. It can be possible that he is self-employed / sole trader. In this case he need to include his own name and his business name (Castle Pension Solutions) on any official paperwork, like invoices, letters, promotion, etc. This information is missing on the website http://www.castlepensionsolutions.co.uk/. As there is no responsible person and no address information listed, is the owner of the domain for everything on the sites responsible.
The whois information (nominet.org.uk) returns Nick Danks as owner of the domain castlepensionsolutions.co.uk - the registrant is the owner of the domain and the registrar is the name of the company, which has registered it:
Tyne and Wear
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 27-Mar-2014
Paragon Internet Group Ltd t/a Tsohost [Tag = UKWEBHOSTING]
Registered on: 27-Mar-2014
Expiry date: 27-Mar-2016
Last updated: 24-Mar-2015
Registered until expiry date.
WHOIS lookup made at 13:13:39 09-May-2015
At Google+ we find an address of Castle Pension Solutions. Even on this site is the ownership missing:
Castle Pension Solutions
24 Farrier Close Washington NE38 8RW
At the UK Yellow Pages we find a free entry - again without a real name:
Castle Pension Solutions
Speculation House, Speculation Place, Washington, NE37 2AP, Tyne and Wear
Tel: 0191 4479400
That have been the facts and this facts did not get invented by myself - they are written down in the UK law and can get confirmed by following the provided government links. According the above information is Nick Danks not only a web creator. He is the owner of the website and the "company". For the case Nick Danks has been working for Paul Rowe for creating the website, Nick Danks made a terrible failure by registering the domain on his own name instead of registering the domain under the name of Paul Rowe. Such failures are normally not done from absolutely beginners. Additional is written at the website: "Designed by The Duo Group" and not by Nick Danks.
As Paul Rowe and Nick Danks are ignoring already the basic law about naming companies and don't know about their own responsibilities and duties, I think that they have even not registered their "company" at the tax office.
The remaining complaints in the email are nothing else than self protection. Each SCAMMER thinks that he only need to complaint the quality of the delivered work that he need not pay something. I read the same justification in each email from a scammer. They use the same arguments like Paul Rowe and are thinking that they need to write something and it is enough. Proves are like every time missing.
Paul Rowe contradicts himself with his argumentation of the quality from the leads. If the leads are not in the expected quality then he does not need to find excuses for paying later, telling lies and giving unreasonable excuses. Such a behavior is only done to keep the call center working and taking advantage of their unpaid work!
Even now he promised to pay if the negative comments will get deleted from the social networks. The only problem is that nobody will believe someone, which has lies permanently!